<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › ISBD view
SAVITCH, H.V

Metropolitan Consolidation versus Metropolitan Governance in Luisville - 2000

Two paths to New Regionalism are being pursued in American metropolises. One route, metropolitan consolidation, focuses on restructuring formal government. The other route, metropolitan governance, aims to restructure intergovernmental relations and processes. In a case study of Louisville and Jefferson County, Kentucky, the authors compare the two approaches. Following two failed efforts at city-county consolidation, Luisville-Jefferson County forged a city-county compact to bring about metropolitan governance, even in the absence of metropolitan government. The compact provides dor tax sharing, joint service provision , and a moratorium on new municipal incorporation or annexation. Civic leaders are now calling for metropolitan consolidation. An alternative proposal for the creation of the federated city that would have built on the compact was rejected. After considering both approaches, the authors conclude that a governance strategy will better advance the agenda of New Regionalism

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha