<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › ISBD view
HAMMONS, Christopher W

Was James Madison Wrong? Rethinking the American Preference for Short, Framework-Oriented Constitutions - New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, December 1999

American constitutional thought has long held that short, framework-oriented constitutions last longer than lengthy, statute-oriented constitutions. The longevity of the U.S. Constitution contributes heavily to this assumption. Not surprisingly, political scientists criticize state constitutions for their greater length and tendency to address issues better dealt with through ordinary statute law. These "defects" are frequently cited as responsible for the shorter lifespan of state constitutions. An examination of the 145 constitutions used by the American states since 1776, however, reveals a relationship among content, length, and durability that refutes. the assumption that the design of the national constitution is necessarily superior. To the contrary, the analysis here ere reveals that longer and more detailed design of state constitutions actually enhances rather than reduces their longevity.

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha