<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › MARC details for record no. 10007

Where do policy networks come from? (Record no. 10007)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03421naa a2200181uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 9868
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20190211154843.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 030107s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA)
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] PHL2MARC21 1.1
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name RAAB, Jorg
9 (RLIN) 8699
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Where do policy networks come from?
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. oct.2002
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. "Where do inter-organizational Networks come from?" asked Gulati and Gargiulo in an article that appeared in the American Journal of Sociology in 1999; the authors were trying to explain the formation of strategic alliances between business organizations. Their central message was that the formation of strategic alliances results from a longitudinal dynamic in which action and structure anre closely intertwined. The structure of interorganizational relations in understood as a macro phenomenon emerging out of conscious micro decisions. These decisions usually have utilitarian motives (to gain access o resources). While the results of the research on policy networks presented here confirm that the development of governance systems is based on an interplay of structure and agency, it is argued that it is especially institutional factors (not only utilitarian motives) that let actors in policy networks establish multiple (horizontal) linkages. These theoretical arguments will be illustrated by data from a study on privatization networks in East Germany during the economic transformation between 1990 and 1994. The organizational center of this transformation was the privatization agency. Treuhandanstalt. The policy that Treuhandanstalt implemented was the fast privatization of East German enterprises. Very often, however, these East German enterprises were in rather poor shape and according to stric economic standards they would have to be closed down. That, however, was politically and socially undersirable, especially int eh case of large and symbolically important companies and given the negative overall development. as a consequence, intensive negotiations evolved about the future of these large companies among a multitude of public and private East and West German actors. These actors determined the outcomes, which can be qualified as public policy because the decisions affected the social, economic, and ultimately the political conditions of whole regions. In this article I will use quantitative analysis to describe and analyze the policy networks that evolved during the privatization of two prominent industries, shipbuilding and steel. I will then explore the factors that contributed to the development of these specific governance structures. Five groups of factors can explain the development of these structures: technical necessities, comparative advantages of network forms of governance in specific situations, power and interest, contextual factors, and formal and informal institutions. I will argue that institutinal factors especially played a vital role in the actors' decisions to establish multiple ties and engage in multilateral negotiations. This argument is supported by data on formal instittuional structures as well as informal norms and values (cognitive assessments and attitudes of the key representative of the corporate actors)
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Related parts 12, 4, p. 581-622
Place, publisher, and date of publication , oct.2002
Record control number
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Periódico
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20030107
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) Lucima
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Lucimara
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20060601
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1208^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Quiteria
Holdings
Status de empréstimo Status de perda Status de danificação Restrição de uso Não pode ser emprestado Código da coleção Localização permanente Localização atual Data de aquisição Date last seen Preço efetivo a partir de Tipo de material
          Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos 2017-09-27 2017-09-27 2017-09-27 Periódico

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha