<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › MARC details for record no. 10496

Performance management, evaluation annd learning in `modern`local government (Record no. 10496)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01856naa a2200181uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 10370
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20190211155022.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 030122s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA)
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] PHL2MARC21 1.1
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name SANDERSON, Ian
9 (RLIN) 9439
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Performance management, evaluation annd learning in `modern`local government
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2001
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Public sector reforms throughout OECD member states are producing a new model of `public governance`embodyng a more modest role for the state and a strong emphasis on performance management. In the UK the development of performance management in the context of the `new public management` has been primarily `top-down` with a dominant concern for enhancing control and `upwards accountablity`rather than promoting learning and improvment. The development of performance management and evaluation in local government in the UK has been conditioned by external pressures, especially reforms imposed by central government, which have encouraged an `instrumental-managerial`focus on performance measurement. The new Labour government`s programme of `modernizing local government`laces considerable emphasis on performance review and evaluation as a driver of continuous improvement inpromotng Best Value. Howeer, recent reserach has indicated that the capacity for evaluation in localgovernment is uneven and many obstacles to evaluation exist in organizational cultures. Local authorities need to go beyond the development of review systms and processes to ensure that the capacity for evaluation and learning is embeded as an attribute of `culture` in order to achieve the purpose of Best Value
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Public Administration an International Quarterly
Related parts 79, 2, p. 297-313
Place, publisher, and date of publication , 2001
Record control number
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Periódico
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20030122
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) Cassio
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Cassio
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20060609
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1602^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Quiteria
Holdings
Status de empréstimo Status de perda Status de danificação Restrição de uso Não pode ser emprestado Código da coleção Localização permanente Localização atual Data de aquisição Date last seen Preço efetivo a partir de Tipo de material
          Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos 2017-09-28 2017-09-28 2017-09-28 Periódico

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha