<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › MARC details for record no. 11678

Defining the implementation problem : (Record no. 11678)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01894naa a2200181uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 11555
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20190211155517.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 030226s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA)
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] PHL2MARC21 1.1
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name CLINE, Kurt D
9 (RLIN) 2285
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Defining the implementation problem :
Remainder of title organizational management versus cooperation
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. jul. 2000
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. The purpose of this article is to determine which definition of the implementation problem, organizational management or cooperation, provides the best understanding of the implementation process. In order to do this, I will compare models of the implementation process that use different conceptions of the problem. the models that are used in this analysis are (1) Goggin et al's. communications model of intergovernmental policy implementation (CM) and (2) implementation regime framework (IRF). The CM conceives of the implementation problem as one of organizational management; the IRF conceives of the implementationproblem as achieving cooperation. These models are evaluated using four criteria: the treatment of both the top-down and bottom-up approaches; the role of communication in the implementation process; the level of conflict/cooperation in the implementation process; and applicability to the concept of networks. The results of this analysis reveal that Stocker's IRF, which defines the implementation problem as achieving cooperation, provides a better understanding of the implementation process. The CM, which is based on the organizational management perspective, is much more limited. The implications this analysis has for future research of the implementation process are also discussed
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Related parts 10, 3, p. 551-571
Place, publisher, and date of publication , jul. 2000
Record control number
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Periódico
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20030226
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) Lucima
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Lucimara
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20060210
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1601^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Quiteria
Holdings
Status de empréstimo Status de perda Status de danificação Restrição de uso Não pode ser emprestado Código da coleção Localização permanente Localização atual Data de aquisição Date last seen Preço efetivo a partir de Tipo de material
          Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos 2017-09-28 2017-09-28 2017-09-28 Periódico

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha