<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › MARC details for record no. 11680

Regulatory negotiation versus conventional rule making : (Record no. 11680)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01709naa a2200193uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 11557
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20190211155518.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 030226s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA)
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] PHL2MARC21 1.1
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name LANGBEIN, Laura I
9 (RLIN) 5861
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Regulatory negotiation versus conventional rule making :
Remainder of title claims, counterclaims, and empirical evidence
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. jul. 2000
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Based on a survey of participants in eight negotiated rule makings at the Environmental Protection Agency and in six comparable conventional EPA rule makings, we find that, when the rule is negotiated, there is greater satifaction with the substance of the final rule (e.g., net benefits to the respondent's organization, general effectiveness/efficiency) and with the overall process. Participants in negotiated rules also learn more, but they face higher costs. Rules selected for negotiation appear more complex and involve detailed issues of compliance. There is no difference between the rule makings in the perceived net benefits of participation, in the perception of parties being left our or a party with disproportionate influence, in the overall responsiveness of EPA to public participation, or in the amount of litigation. The results are consistent with theoretical arguments that support the benefits of face-to-face negotiation among affected parties under certain circumstances, but they leave important questions about efficiency and equity unanswered
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name KERWIN, Cornelius M
9 (RLIN) 20354
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Related parts 10, 3, p. 599-632
Place, publisher, and date of publication , jul. 2000
Record control number
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Periódico
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20030226
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) Lucima
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Lucimara
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20060210
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1606^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Quiteria
Holdings
Status de empréstimo Status de perda Status de danificação Restrição de uso Não pode ser emprestado Código da coleção Localização permanente Localização atual Data de aquisição Date last seen Preço efetivo a partir de Tipo de material
          Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos 2017-09-28 2017-09-28 2017-09-28 Periódico

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha