<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › MARC details for record no. 11742

Disconnects and consequences in organization theory? (Record no. 11742)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03355naa a2200217uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 11619
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20190211155541.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 030228s2002 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA)
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] PHL2MARC21 1.1
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name HININGS, C.R
9 (RLIN) 4820
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Disconnects and consequences in organization theory?
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Ithaca :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Johnson Graduate School of Management,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. September 2002
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. In this ASQ Forum essay, Hinings and Greenwood look back over the body of work on organizations to trace the directions that scholars have taken in answering the early defining question in the field, What are the consequences of the existence of organizations? They consider the question in terms of how organizations affect privilege and disadvantage in society and how privilege and advantage are distributed in organizations. How the consequences of organizations are studied, they propose, has been affected by organization studies' move out of the disciplines (especially sociology) and into business schools, as well as by declining attention to history. The essay concludes with implications for research agendas that consider power and privilege.
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Bartunek uses the corporate scandals of 2002 as a springboard to comment on Hinings and Greenwood's view that business schools may not be the best place for organizational scholarship. Beginning with ethics as taught in business school, possible conflicts of interest for professors, and the gap between what researchers produce and what practitioners can use, she discusses three questions that contribute to understanding the proper place of organization studies: (1) Who are the appropriate stakeholders of the research? (2) What are the implied relationships between scholars and stakeholders? and (3) How is research likely to have an impact? The commentary concludes with cautious optimism that business school professors can produce relevant scholarship that speaks to the issues of power and the societal impacts of organizations that concern Hinings and Greenwood.
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Clegg's commentary builds on Hinings and Greenwood's distinction between asking questions from a disciplinary sociological perspective, in which the focus is on control and its consequences, or from a business perspective, with a focus on the organizational design of efficient and effective solutions to the problems of business owners. He discusses the Holocaust, ignored by most organization scholars, as an example of organizational efficiency resulting in the worst in human action and asks where in organization theory focused on the design of effective solutions does one find a concern with questions of power and responsibility? He traces a genealogy of moral questions in the study of organizations and reviews theories of organizations and power outside mainstream organization studies, comparing North American scholarship and training with work and academic work and training elsewhere. Concluding thoughts center on the current climate of both business and scholarship and possibilities for change
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name GREENWOOD, Royston
9 (RLIN) 20376
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Administrative Science Quarterly
Related parts 47, 3, p. 411-421
Place, publisher, and date of publication Ithaca : Johnson Graduate School of Management, September 2002
International Standard Serial Number ISSN 00018392
Record control number
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Periódico
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20030228
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) Lucima
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Lucimara
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20101019
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1517^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Daiane
Holdings
Status de empréstimo Status de perda Status de danificação Restrição de uso Não pode ser emprestado Código da coleção Localização permanente Localização atual Data de aquisição Date last seen Preço efetivo a partir de Tipo de material
          Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos 2017-09-28 2017-09-28 2017-09-28 Periódico

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha