<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › MARC details for record no. 11872

Presidential address - seeing through the fog : (Record no. 11872)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02216naa a2200181uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 11749
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20190211155629.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 030312s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA)
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] PHL2MARC21 1.1
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name AARON, Henry J
9 (RLIN) 8
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Presidential address - seeing through the fog :
Remainder of title
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2000
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. All public policies have two things in common. they deal with te future and, as a result, they are based on forecasts or projections. The forecasts or projectios may be implicit or based on native extrapolation or ad hoc assumptions. They may be explicit and based on elaborate extrapolations or on behavioral models. In either case, unfortunately, they are notoriously unreliable. In fact, they almos always are wrong - sometimes just a bit wrong, but often massively wrong. Nonetheless, forecastas are what distinguishes reasoned planning from blind action. Without forecasts, we would be totally at sea. That we have to use forecasts of projections, that we know they will be wrong, and that they usually are wrong raise some difficult questions for policy analysis and policymarking. Regrettably, in may view they receive too little attention. My purpose todayis to urge that they receive more. My comments are intended to make four points. First, it is important for policymakers to appreciate how erro-prone forecast and projections actually are. Second, it is important not to permit the availability of projections or forecasts to obscure fundamental policy questions that are important in any plausible scenario. Third, uncertainty means that, where possible, it is prudent to design policies with built-in flexibility that respond automatically to diverse possible outcomes. Fourth, where built-in flexibility is impossible, complete analysis should take into account the consequences if forecasts prove wrong, and weigh those consequences against the results of postponing action until information improves or against other policies under the plausible range of possible outcomes
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
Related parts 19, 2, p. 193-206
Place, publisher, and date of publication , 2000
Record control number
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Periódico
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20030312
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) Cassio
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Cassio
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20060331
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1659^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Quiteria
Holdings
Status de empréstimo Status de perda Status de danificação Restrição de uso Não pode ser emprestado Código da coleção Localização permanente Localização atual Data de aquisição Date last seen Preço efetivo a partir de Tipo de material
          Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos 2017-09-28 2017-09-28 2017-09-28 Periódico

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha