Men, Women and the Dynamics of Presidential Approval (Record no. 13665)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 01984naa a2200169uu 4500 |
001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
control field | 5092617401817 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
control field | OSt |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20190211160146.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 050926s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d |
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA) | |
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] | PHL2MARC21 1.1 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | CLARKE, Harold ...et.al |
9 (RLIN) | 21906 |
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Men, Women and the Dynamics of Presidential Approval |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Place of publication, distribution, etc. | Cambridge : |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | Cambridge University Press, |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | January 2005 |
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | Although commentary on the 'gender gap' is a staple of political discourse in the United States, most analyses of the dynamics of presidential approval have ignored possible gender differences in the forces driving approval ratings of US presidents. This article analyses gender differences in the impact of economic evaluations and political interventions on the dynamics of presidential approval between 1978 and 1997. The analyses are made possible by disaggregating 240 monthly Survey of Consumers datasets gathered over this period. These data show that women's economic evaluations are consistently more pessimistic than men's, regardless of who occupied the Oval Office. Analyses of rival presidential approval models reveal that a national prospective economic evaluation model performs best for women, but a personal prospective model works best for a men. Parameter estimates indicate that economic evaluations accounted for substantial proportions of gender differences in presidential approval in the post-Carter era. Men and women also reacted differently to presidential transitions, with approval increasing more among men when Reagan replaced Carter, and more among women when Clinton replaced Bush. The hypothesis that men are more suceptible than women to raly effects induced by domestic and international crises and wars does not receive consistent support |
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
Title | British Journal of Political Science |
Related parts | 35, 1, p. 31-51 |
Place, publisher, and date of publication | Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, January 2005 |
International Standard Serial Number | ISSN 0007-1234 |
Record control number | |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
Koha item type | Periódico |
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
-- | 20050926 |
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1740^b |
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Analuiza |
No items available.