Does collective identity presuppose an other? On the alleged incoherence of global solidarity (Record no. 15516)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01844naa a2200181uu 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | 6041114563921 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
| control field | OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20190211161002.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 060411s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d |
| 999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA) | |
| Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] | PHL2MARC21 1.1 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | ABIZADEH, Arash |
| 9 (RLIN) | 32 |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Does collective identity presuppose an other? On the alleged incoherence of global solidarity |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. | New York, NY : |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | American Political Science Association, |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | February 2005 |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Two arguments apparently support the thesis that collective identity presupposes an Other: the recognition argument, according to which seeing myself as a self requires recognition by an other whom I also recognize as a self (Hegel); and the dialogic argument, according to which my sense of self can only develop dialogically (Taylor). But applying these arguments to collective identity involves a compositional fallacy. Two modern ideologies mask the particularist thesis's falsehood. The ideology of indivisible state sovereignty makes sovereignty as such appear particularistic by fusing internal with external sovereignty; nationalism imagines national identity as particularistic by linking it to sovereignty. But the concatenation of internal sovereignty, external sovereignty, and nation is contingent. Schmitt's thesis that the political presupposes an other conflates internal and external sovereignty, while Mouffe's neo-Schmittianism conflates difference (Derrida) with alterity. A shared global identity may face many obstacles, but metaphysical impossibility and conceptual confusion are not among them. |
| 773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Title | American Political Science Review |
| Related parts | 99, 1, p. 45-60 |
| Place, publisher, and date of publication | New York, NY : American Political Science Association, February 2005 |
| International Standard Serial Number | ISSN 0003-0554 |
| Record control number | |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Koha item type | Periódico |
| 998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
| -- | 20060411 |
| Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1456^b |
| Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Natália |
| 998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
| -- | 20060411 |
| Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1522^b |
| Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Natália |
No items available.
