Reading Habermas in Anarchy : (Record no. 15552)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01903naa a2200169uu 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | 6041310053021 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
| control field | OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20190211161014.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 060413s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d |
| 999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA) | |
| Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] | PHL2MARC21 1.1 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | MITZEN, Jennifer |
| 9 (RLIN) | 24455 |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Reading Habermas in Anarchy : |
| Remainder of title | Multilateral Diplomacy and Global Public Spheres |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. | New York, NY : |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | American Political Science Association, |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | August 2005 |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | States routinely justify their policies in interstate forums, and this reason-giving seems to serve a legitimating function. But how could this be? For Habermas and other global public sphere theorists, the exchange of reasons oriented toward understandingcommunicative actionis central to public sphere governance, where political power is held accountable to those affected. But most global public sphere theory considers communicative action only among nonstate actors. Indeed, anarchy is a hard case for public spheres. The normative potential of communicative action rests on its instability: only where consensus can be undone by better reasons, through argument, can we say speakers are holding one another accountable to reason. But argument means disagreement, and especially in anarchy disagreement can mean violence. Domestically, the state backstops argument to prevent violence. Internationally, I propose that international society and publicity function similarly. Public talk can mitigate the security dilemma and enable interstate communicative action. Viewing multilateral diplomacy as a legitimation process makes sense of the intuition that interstate talk matters, while tempering a potentially aggressive cosmopolitanism. |
| 773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Title | American Political Science Review |
| Related parts | 99, 3, p. 401-417 |
| Place, publisher, and date of publication | New York, NY : American Political Science Association, August 2005 |
| International Standard Serial Number | ISSN 0003-0554 |
| Record control number | |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Koha item type | Periódico |
| 998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
| -- | 20060413 |
| Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1005^b |
| Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Natália |
No items available.
