<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › MARC details for record no. 20997

When Fully Informed States Make Good the Threat of War : (Record no. 20997)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01850naa a2200193uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 6122116083821
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20190211161922.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 061221s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA)
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] PHL2MARC21 1.1
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name LANGLOIS, Catherine C.
9 (RLIN) 29408
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title When Fully Informed States Make Good the Threat of War :
Remainder of title Rational Escalation and the Failure of Bargaining
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. New York, NY :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Cambridge University Press,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. October 2006
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Why would fully informed, rational actors fight over possession of a valued asset when they could negotiate a settlement in peace? Our explanation of the decision to fight highlights the incentives that are present when the defender holds a valued asset coveted by the challenger. The defender receives utility from possession of the contested asset and sees any compromise as a loss that is lower if postponed. The challenger, instead, sees any compromise as a gain that is more valuable if reached earlier. Faced with the defender's vested interest in the status quo, the challenger needs to threaten war and may have no choice but to implement the threat to force a settlement. For the defender, the threat of war is a deterrent that might incite the challenger to back down. In the perfect equilibria that we describe, the players' ability to threaten each other credibly allows them to maintain incompatible bargaining positions instead of helping them narrow their differences. But the very credibility of these threats leads our rivals to engage in what can become lengthy protracted wars.
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name LANGLOIS, Jean-Pierre P.
9 (RLIN) 29409
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title British Journal of Political Science
Related parts 36, 4, p. 645-669
Place, publisher, and date of publication New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, October 2006
International Standard Serial Number ISSN 0007-1234
Record control number
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Periódico
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20061221
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1608^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Natália
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20081031
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1104^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Zailton

No items available.

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha