<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › MARC details for record no. 23723

Interdependency, beliefs, and coalition behavior : (Record no. 23723)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02254naa a2200217uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 7053017032710
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20190211163002.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 070530s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA)
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] PHL2MARC21 1.1
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name FENGER, Menno
9 (RLIN) 32068
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Interdependency, beliefs, and coalition behavior :
Remainder of title a contribution to the advocacy coalition framework
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Dordrecht, Netherlands :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Springer,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. June 2001
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), developed by Paul Sabatier, is generally considered one of the most promising theories of the policy process (see, for instance, Parsons, 1995; Eberg, 1997; Schlager and Blomquist, 1996; Grin and Hoppe, 1997). The framework considers policy change as the result of learning processes within and between advocacy coalitions. However, in explaining policy change, the ACF focuses almost exclusively on the structure, content, stability, and evolution of the policy belief systems of advocacy coalitions. There is no attempt to account for how actors with certain policy belief systems develop and maintain these advocacy coalitions.
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. From the literature on interorganizational relations and policy networks, we know that the extent and structure of interdependencies between actors are important determinants of the behavior of the actors in interorganizational relations. Differences in interdependencies are supposed to lead to different types of interorganizational arrangements.
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. In this article, a hypothesis is developed that explains the development and maintenance of advocacy coalitions by looking at both the interdependencies and the policy belief systems of the actors. The importance of this approach is demonstrated by applying it to the debate on oil and gas leasing in the outer continental shelf of the United States. It turns out that the attention for interdependency contributes significantly to the possibilities of explaining the behavior of single actors and advocacy coalitions
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name KLOK, Pieter-Jan
9 (RLIN) 32069
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Policy Sciences
Related parts 34, 2, p. 157-170
Place, publisher, and date of publication Dordrecht, Netherlands : Springer, June 2001
International Standard Serial Number ISSN 0032-2867
Record control number
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Periódico
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20070530
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1703^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Tiago
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20070604
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1444^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Zailton

No items available.

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha