<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › MARC details for record no. 24685

Developments in the law : (Record no. 24685)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01942naa a2200193uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 7100416584810
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20190527151356.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 071004s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 d
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA)
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] PHL2MARC21 1.1
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name ROBERTS, Robert
9 (RLIN) 32837
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Developments in the law :
Remainder of title Garcetti v. Ceballos and the workplace freedom of speech rights of public employes
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Malden, MA :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Blackwell Publishers,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. July / Aug.2007
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. On May 30, 2006 the Supreme Court handed down a 5–4 decision in the case of Garcetti v. Ceballos, announcing that "when public employees make statements pursuant to their official duties, they are not speaking as citizens for First Amendment purposes, and the Constitution does not insulate their communications from employer discipline." Previously, the Court had held in Pickering v. Board of Education (1968) that the First Amendment’s protection of freedom of speech generally prohibited public employers from firing or disciplining employees for speaking out on matters of "public concern." The Pickering decision established a two-part test that first required federal courts to determine whether the employee had spoken out on a matter of public concern and then whether the disruptive impact of the employee’s statement justified the disciplinary action. This article argues that the Garcetti decision may deter many public employees from disclosing governmental inefficiency and misconduct and presenting dissenting viewpoints on matters of clear public concern. Consequently, the decision may make it more difficult for the leadership of public agencies to uncover inefficiency and misconduct
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note Public administration review PAR
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Public Administration Review: PAR
Related parts 67, 4, p. 662-672
Place, publisher, and date of publication Malden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, July / Aug.2007
International Standard Serial Number ISSN 00333352
Record control number
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Periódico
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20071004
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1658^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Tiago
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20090608
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1633^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) mayze

No items available.

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha