Gauging support for innovative farmland preservation techniques (Record no. 25153)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02555naa a2200193uu 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | 7113017171510 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
| control field | OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20190211163310.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 071130s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d |
| 999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA) | |
| Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] | PHL2MARC21 1.1 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | DUKE, Joshua M. |
| 9 (RLIN) | 33189 |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Gauging support for innovative farmland preservation techniques |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. | Dordrecht, Netherlands : |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | Springer, |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | June 2007 |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Given growing concerns about the loss of farmland in the US, governmental and nonprofit groups are seeking innovative, cost-effective methods to preserve lands that will elicit additional landowner participation. This article describes four innovative farmland preservation techniques and derives implications for the policy process through interviews of key stakeholders: program administrators, lawmakers, and landowners. Experts on farmland preservation were also interviewed to ensure stakeholder perceptions substantively inform the policy process. Four techniques were selected for assessment from approximately 30 novel techniques. Reactions to these policy options reflect stakeholder perceptions of a baseline condition; the perceptions help evaluate which options are likely to survive the policy process and what attributes will lead to their acceptability because few of these techniques have yet become policy. Although the stakeholders may have more limited experience with the policy process, land preservation experts validated many of the results and the possibility of success in the rough and tumble of the policy process. Of the four investigated techniques rights of first refusal was the most favored, although respondents thought effective implementation would require careful targeting and a dedicated funding source. Experts agreed this technique was most likely to survive in the political arena. Agricultural conservation pension was also viewed favorably, though it was considered administratively difficult to implement. Several experts thought that, though inchoate, the pension plan could potentially be more cost effective than rights of first refusal. Land preservation tontines were perceived to be an interesting concept, but confusing, difficult to implement, and ill-defined. Term conservation easements were viewed unfavorably because they did not preserve land permanently |
| 700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | LYNCH, Lori |
| 9 (RLIN) | 33190 |
| 773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Title | Policy Sciences |
| Related parts | 40, 2, p. 123-155 |
| Place, publisher, and date of publication | Dordrecht, Netherlands : Springer, June 2007 |
| International Standard Serial Number | ISSN 00322687 |
| Record control number | |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Koha item type | Periódico |
| 998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
| -- | 20071130 |
| Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1717^b |
| Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Tiago |
| 998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
| -- | 20071130 |
| Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1722^b |
| Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Tiago |
No items available.
