Public participation and claimsmaking : (Record no. 26452)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02301naa a2200193uu 4500 |
001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
control field | 8052316364610 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
control field | OSt |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20190211163635.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 080523s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d |
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA) | |
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] | PHL2MARC21 1.1 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | JEWELL, Christopher |
9 (RLIN) | 34252 |
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Public participation and claimsmaking : |
Remainder of title | evidence utilization and divergent policy frames in California's ergonomics rulemaking |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Place of publication, distribution, etc. | New York : |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | Oxford University, |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | oct. 2007 |
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | Notice and comment provisions in agency rulemaking provide an important mechanism for the public to contribute to policy. Yet there is limited research on how interest groups participate in this process. California's passage of an ergonomics standard in 1997, the only current state statute in the country, provides a useful, high salience policy case for examining public commentary. Between an initially proposed comprehensive standard and the enactment of a much weaker regulation occurred the largest public response in California's state Occupational Safety and Health Administration history. Through a detailed content analysis of the notice and comment submissions we identify features of participation and claimsmaking that differ between business and nonbusiness submissions. Business groups were the large majority of participants and also presented a disproportionate amount of evidence, using an "abstract-technical" policy frame to assert the illegitimacy of the ergonomics standard. Labor, public health organizations and private citizens represented less than one-third of the participants and relied primarily on experiential information and a "concretized-moral" characterization of policy issues in support of the standard. The existence of these distinct "interpretive communities" that mobilize different resources raises questions about whether public commentary can fulfill its purported "democratic accountability" purpose as well as underline the limitations of appealing to scientific expertise for solving complex policy problems |
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | BERO, Lisa |
9 (RLIN) | 34253 |
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
Title | Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory - JPART |
Related parts | 17, 4, p. 625-650 |
Place, publisher, and date of publication | New York : Oxford University, oct. 2007 |
International Standard Serial Number | ISSN 10531858 |
Record control number | |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
Koha item type | Periódico |
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
-- | 20080523 |
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1636^b |
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Tiago |
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
-- | 20120521 |
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1037^b |
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Carolina |
No items available.