Where's the Justice? : (Record no. 28397)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 01976naa a2200169uu 4500 |
001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
control field | 9022616312410 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
control field | OSt |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20190211164814.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 090226s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d |
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA) | |
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] | PHL2MARC21 1.1 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | LIPSON, Daniel S |
9 (RLIN) | 36417 |
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Where's the Justice? : |
Remainder of title | affirmative action's severed civil rights roots in the age of diversity |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Place of publication, distribution, etc. | New York, NY : |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | Cambridge University Press, |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | December 2008 |
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | The institutionalization of race-conscious inclusion policies in employment, education, and contracting has largely endured in post-civil rights America despite predictions of their demise. However, scholarship has continued to mislabel many of the specific policies in these organizations and governments as affirmative action policies, even though many such policies lack the civil rights roots necessary to warrant this label. In this article, I explain how many organizations have recast, supplemented, or replaced their rights-based affirmative action policies with utilitarian diversity policies. While the conventional, civil rights framework for analyzing affirmative action obscures the rise of such organizational diversity policies, an alternative body of scholarship that employs a diversity framework has shed light on the causes, content, and consequences of this policy and political realignment. The Supreme Court's 2003 Grutter v. Bollinger decision and the political activism surrounding Michigan's Proposal 2 in 2006 both exemplify the trademark signs of this shift from rights-based affirmative action to organizational diversity policies. The article concludes by assessing the promise and dangers of this trend of rooting racial inclusion policies in a utilitarian diversity logic rather than a civil rights logic |
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
Title | Perspectives on politics |
Related parts | 6, 4, p. 691-706 |
Place, publisher, and date of publication | New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, December 2008 |
International Standard Serial Number | ISSN 15375927 |
Record control number | |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
Koha item type | Periódico |
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
-- | 20090226 |
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1631^b |
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Tiago |
No items available.