<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › MARC details for record no. 28438

What gets done and why : (Record no. 28438)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01806naa a2200169uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 9030220043110
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20190211164826.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 090302s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA)
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] PHL2MARC21 1.1
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name STUTZ, Jeffrey R
9 (RLIN) 36468
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title What gets done and why :
Remainder of title implementing the recommendations of public inquires
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Toronto :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. IPAC,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. September/Septembre 2008
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Public inquiries are often the instrument of choice when governments decide to re-think their approach to large issues, yet there has been little empirical research on how effective they are. This article is an evidence-based look at what affects the implementation of recommendations made by public inquiries. It considers eleven inquiries, examining how they operated, their political and administrative setting, and what action was taken on the recommendations. The central hypothesis is that governments do implement the recommendations of public inquiries under certain conditions. Such implementation extends not only to technical, incremental recommendations but also to recommendations involving systemic changes. The findings point to the role of judges who head and preside over inquiries as policy influencers. Often buffered by inquiry counsel or policy staff, judges may test potential recommendations with governments and other interested parties. The impact of inquiry hearings suggests that public inquiries do not necessarily serve a government's wishes to delay action. If inquiry hearings are the top item in the news, it is hard to see how that furthers a government agenda to bury the issues
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Canadian Public Administration
Related parts 51, 3, p. 501-521
Place, publisher, and date of publication Toronto : IPAC, September/Septembre 2008
International Standard Serial Number ISSN 00084840
Record control number
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Periódico
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20090302
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 2004^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Tiago

No items available.

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha