Federal employees, torts, and the westfall act of 1988 (Record no. 29169)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01791naa a2200205uu 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | 9052017571530 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
| control field | OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20190211164940.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090520s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d |
| 999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA) | |
| Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] | PHL2MARC21 1.1 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | LEE, D. Robert |
| 9 (RLIN) | 36981 |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Federal employees, torts, and the westfall act of 1988 |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. | Malden, MA : |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | Blackwell Publishers, |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | jul./aug. 1996 |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | What have been the implications of the 1988 Federal employess Liability reform and tort compensation act? The estfall act was pased in 1988 to re-immunize federal workers from suits in common law tort, such as negligence. The act was passed to overturn a Supreme court decision that caused a crisis affecting employees in all theree branches of government. The law accomplished its main purpose but also has led to a set of new issues. Federal courts are in disagreement over the process by which the attorney general may transform a suit from being ano against an individual to one this certification process is possible. Experience with the law involves doctrines about legislative intent, delegation of powers, and exhaustion of administrative remedies. For both those bringing suits and those being sued, the process is frustrating in that extended delays may occur while the courts determine in what court a case should be heard - federal district court or a state court - and who the defendant should be - the federal government or the federal employee. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | Public administration review PAR |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | July/August 1996 volume 56 numero 4 |
| 773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Title | Public administration review : PAR |
| Related parts | 56, 4, p. 334-340 |
| Place, publisher, and date of publication | Malden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, jul./aug. 1996 |
| International Standard Serial Number | ISSN 00333352 |
| Record control number | |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Koha item type | Periódico |
| 998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
| -- | 20090520 |
| Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1757^b |
| Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Ilkia |
| 998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
| -- | 20090608 |
| Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1555^b |
| Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Ilkia |
No items available.
