The American West's longest mammal migration : (Record no. 30374)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02408naa a2200205uu 4500 |
001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
control field | 9101315482137 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
control field | OSt |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20190211165715.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 091013s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d |
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA) | |
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] | PHL2MARC21 1.1 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | CHERNEY, David N. |
9 (RLIN) | 38032 |
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | The American West's longest mammal migration : |
Remainder of title | clarifying and securing the common interest |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Place of publication, distribution, etc. | Netherlands : |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | Springs, |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | May 2009 |
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | Over the last 10 years, conflict has grown over a 170-mile pronghorn antelope (Antilocapra americana) migration between Grand Teton National Park and the Upper Green River Basin in western Wyoming. Resolving conflict in the common interest is proving difficult. This movement is the longest mammal migration in the lower 48 states, spanning the jurisdiction of three federal agencies, three Wyoming counties, and over 40 private landowners. In addition, there are over ten non-governmental conservation organizations, two major state agencies, Wyomings executive office, and many citizens involved in the issue. There are three major problem definitions serving the beliefs of participants: the ecological-scientific (conservation biologists, environmentalists), local rights (local control, property rights), and cultural value (historic, western heritage) definitions. These definitions challenge the social and decision making processes of regional communities and government agencies. Underlying the problem of securing the common interest is the highly fragmented patterns of authority and control, misorganized arena(s), and parochial perspectives of many participants. Options promoted by participants can be loosely classified as top-down (government, expert driven) versus bottom-up (local, practice-based) approaches and reflect preferences for the distribution and uses of power and other values. Given the social and decision making context of this case, the bottom-up, practiced-based approach would likely best secure a common interest outcome. |
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
Local note | Policy process appraisal - Common interest - Problem definition - Conflict - Wildlife management and policy - Practice-based approach - Wildlife migration - Transboundry management |
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | CLARK, Susan G. |
9 (RLIN) | 38033 |
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
Title | Policy Sciences |
Related parts | 42, 2, p. 95-111 |
Place, publisher, and date of publication | Netherlands : Springs, May 2009 |
International Standard Serial Number | ISSN 00322687 |
Record control number | |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
Koha item type | Periódico |
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
-- | 20091013 |
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1548^b |
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Daiane |
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
-- | 20091021 |
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1532^b |
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Carolina |
No items available.