<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › MARC details for record no. 32512

Special issue : (Record no. 32512)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02548naa a2200193uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 0042012382137
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20190211171122.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 100420s2003 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA)
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] PHL2MARC21 1.1
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name VERWEIJ, Marco (Ed.)
9 (RLIN) 39592
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Special issue :
Remainder of title Deliberately democratizing multilateral organization
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Malden :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Wiley-Blackwell,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. January 2003
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. In Economy and Society, Max Weber posits that bureaucracies that are not reined in by either democratic controls or market discipline will eventually start to pursue public policies that are detrimental to those whose lives these policies should enable or improve. During the last ten years, a number of scholars, activists, parliamentarians, journalists and whistleblowers have come to argue that Weber's hypothesis has often held up for the functioning of multilateral organizations, such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Trade Organization. At least, it appears that little democratic control or market discipline has been imposed on multilateral organizations. Moreover, critics from both the left and the right have severely criticized such multilateral policies as development lending, deregulation of financial markets, and structural adjustment programs. Yet it remains difficult to agree upon appropriate remedies. Many proposals—ranging from outright abolishment of large international organizations to the establishment of global parliaments at the United Nations—have been tabled, but little consensus reigns and various disadvantages (as well as advantages) cling to each of these proposals. This special issue of Governance considers yet another way in which to make multilateral organizations more democratic and pluralistic: by making these organizations more deliberatively democratic. This introduction clarifies what is meant by deliberative decision–making and why it is worthwhile to consider making multilateral organizations more deliberative. It also sets out the other contributions to the issue, which offer different justifications for increased deliberation and discuss alternative forms in which multilateral organizations can be made more deliberatively democratic.
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name JOSLING, Timothy E. (Ed.)
9 (RLIN) 39593
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions
Related parts 16, 1, p. 1-22
Place, publisher, and date of publication Malden : Wiley-Blackwell, January 2003
International Standard Serial Number ISSN 09521895
Record control number
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Periódico
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20100420
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1238^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Daiane
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20130618
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1044^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) karina

No items available.

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha