Seeking justice : (Record no. 33172)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 01923naa a2200181uu 4500 |
001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
control field | 0051717392537 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
control field | OSt |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20190211171619.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 100517s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d |
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA) | |
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] | PHL2MARC21 1.1 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | LENS, Vicki |
9 (RLIN) | 35653 |
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Seeking justice : |
Remainder of title | citizens' use of fair hearings to correct errors in public welfare bureaucracies |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Place of publication, distribution, etc. | Cary : |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | Oxford University, |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | oct. 2009 |
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | An understudied area of public administration is administrative hearings, used by clients to challenge denials or reductions of aid in public welfare programs. They help ensure that officials are applying the law consistently, fairly and equitably, and as intended by policy makers. Drawing on 59 qualitative interviews with public assistance clients in an urban and suburban county in New York who received notices discontinuing or reducing their assistance, this study explores why clients appeal or not and their perceptions of hearings. The findings indicate that clients decisions to contest agency decisions were influenced by their perceptions of how workers treated them, their reactions to powerlessness and stigma, and their social networks, especially client networks. Clients who filed appeals perceived hearings as a valuable tool, albeit one that needed improvements. Although concerned with outcomes, they also focused on the procedural fairness of the hearing and whether they had an opportunity to fully present their case to an impartial decision maker. Although some clients had difficulty navigating the appeals process, procedural fairness was possible to achieve, despite the evident power and status disparities between the parties |
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
Title | Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory |
Related parts | 19, 4, p. 817-838 |
Place, publisher, and date of publication | Cary : Oxford University, oct. 2009 |
International Standard Serial Number | ISSN 10531858 |
Record control number | |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
Koha item type | Periódico |
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
-- | 20100517 |
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1739^b |
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Daiane |
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
-- | 20120517 |
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1347^b |
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Geisneer |
No items available.