The creation of the European economic and monetary union (EMU) : (Record no. 34618)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01876naa a2200181uu 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | 0062415240737 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
| control field | OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20190211173047.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 100624s2000 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d |
| 999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA) | |
| Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] | PHL2MARC21 1.1 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | HOSLI, Madeleine O. |
| 9 (RLIN) | 41321 |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | The creation of the European economic and monetary union (EMU) : |
| Remainder of title | intergovernmental negotiations and two-level games |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. | London : |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | Routledge, |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2000 |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | The European economic and monetary union (EMU) is widely viewed as one of the most important developments in recent European integration. But it is less clear why EMU was started at all, and, more specifically,what the role of individual European Community (EC) member states has been in this process. Most importantly, some puzzling questions arise when trying to establish why Germany favored EMU, and as to its relative importance in the intergovernmental EMU negotiations. This article focuses on the negotiations that led to the establishment of the EMU. It first describes the environment in which the decision was made to move from the existing European monetary system (EMS) to EMU. It then seeks to explain howagreement was reached on EMU and on its institutional provisions and timing as foreseen in the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and its Protocols. In order to explain this, the article resorts to a data base that contains information on the preferences that EC governments held with respect to different aspects of EMU. In addition, it employs simple negotiation models to explore these issues and looks into possible two-level game dynamics that may have influenced the intergovernmental bargaining processs. |
| 773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Title | Journal of European Public Policy |
| Related parts | 7, 5, p. 744-766 |
| Place, publisher, and date of publication | London : Routledge, 2000 |
| International Standard Serial Number | ISSN 13501763 |
| Record control number | |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Koha item type | Periódico |
| 998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
| -- | 20100624 |
| Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1524^b |
| Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Daiane |
| 998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
| -- | 20100629 |
| Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1619^b |
| Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Carolina |
No items available.
