<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › MARC details for record no. 37648

Fairness, equality and legitimacy : (Record no. 37648)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01957naa a2200193uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 0120811551541
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20190211173949.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 101208s2010 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA)
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] PHL2MARC21 1.1
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name TAYLOR-GOOBY, Peter
9 (RLIN) 10548
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Fairness, equality and legitimacy :
Remainder of title a qualitative comparative study of Germany and the UK
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Oxford :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Wiley-Blackwell,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. February 2010
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. The pressures of globalization and shifts towards post-industrialism are producing policies that increasingly emphasize the common themes of activation and of individual responsibility for outcomes. Such approaches suggest normative principles of equality of opportunity rather than of outcome, and of individual rather than collective responsibility for the outcomes achieved. Does this imply a shift towards a common normative framework for European welfare states, with implications for future policy developments? This article reports a recent qualitative study examining ideas about fairness and social provision in the very different regimes of Germany and the UK. The analysis shows that while respondents in both countries value equality of opportunity as a normative principle, those in Germany are much more likely to argue that an equal opportunity approach requires government to guarantee equal access to basic services. They are also more likely to express concerns about market freedoms which allow those who can afford it better access to health care and education. Real differences in welfare values remain, loosely following differences of regime type, despite the greater emphasis on activation and individual responsibility across European welfare states
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name MARTIN, Rose
9 (RLIN) 43208
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Social Policy & Administration
Related parts 44, 1, p. 85-103
Place, publisher, and date of publication Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, February 2010
International Standard Serial Number ISSN 01445596
Record control number
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Periódico
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20101208
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1155^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Jaqueline
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20110118
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1743^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Carolina

No items available.

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha