The rational legitimacy of the Welfare Estate : (Record no. 40617)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01788naa a2200193uu 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | 1101914402341 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
| control field | OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20190211175702.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 111019s1997 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d |
| 999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA) | |
| Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] | PHL2MARC21 1.1 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | FORMA, Pauli |
| 9 (RLIN) | 45622 |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | The rational legitimacy of the Welfare Estate : |
| Remainder of title | popular support for ten income transfer schemes in Finland |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. | UK : |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | Policy Press, |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | apr. 1997 |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | This article explores how popular support for social benefits is connected to their entitlement rules. In addition, the role of self-interest regarding support for social benefits is examined. The importance of these factors is empirically evaluated using a sample of 1,117 Finns. Popular support for ten essential income transfer schemes in Finland is determined. Some of these schemes represent purely means-tested programmes, others are universal. Programmes also vary in their importance to different subgroups of the population. The results give qualified support to the 'welfare backlash' model: universal benefits are found to be more legitimate than selective ones. However, the situation is a little more complicated. Benefits maintaining basic security are also highly legitimate, which indicates that people do not support social security schemes only out of selfish motives. They also have a moral commitment to help those in need. The analysis also reveals clear choices based on self-interest: families with children, for example, strongly defend family benefits and younger people do not allow cutbacks in study allowances |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | China |
| 9 (RLIN) | 13345 |
| 773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Title | Policy & Politics |
| Related parts | 25, 3, p. 235-249 |
| Place, publisher, and date of publication | UK : Policy Press, apr. 1997 |
| International Standard Serial Number | ISSN 03055736 |
| Record control number | |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Koha item type | Periódico |
| 998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
| -- | 20111019 |
| Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1440^b |
| Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Geisneer |
| 998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) | |
| -- | 20111019 |
| Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) | 1504^b |
| Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) | Geisneer |
No items available.
