<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › MARC details for record no. 7219

Drug testing in the public sector : (Record no. 7219)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01868naa a2200217uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 7063
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20190211154212.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 020919s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA)
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] PHL2MARC21 1.1
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name KNOWLES, Eddie Ade
9 (RLIN) 5648
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Drug testing in the public sector :
Remainder of title an interpretation grounded in Rosenblomm`s Competing-Perpesctives Model
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Malden, MA :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Blackwell Publishers,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. jul./aug. 2001
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. In the last few decades, drug testing has become major policy issue in the workplace, with a host of actors competing to promote their own needs and interests. Employers, for example, seek ways to combat the use and abuse of illegal substances by employees. At the same time, unions and their employees legitimately seek to limit overly intruse or unfair methods for testing. The courts have also been major players in the policy arena of drug testing, as witnessed by the surfeit of case law setting parameters around what is and is not legal and constitutional in terms of drug testing. In a effort to move the drug-testing debate forward, this article examines the competing interests in drug testing, interests that ultimately frustate the courts, policy makers, employees, and their unions from reaching a consensus on the use of drug tests in the public sector. To systematically examine this issue, Rosenblooms`s competing-perspectives model of public administration is aplied. The article concludes with policy recommendations for public managers
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note Public Administration Review PAR
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note July/August 2001 Volume 61 Number 4
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name RICCUCI, Norma M
9 (RLIN) 16612
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Public Administration Review: PAR
Related parts 61, 4, p. 424-432
Place, publisher, and date of publication Malden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, jul./aug. 2001
International Standard Serial Number ISSN 00333352
Record control number
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Periódico
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20020919
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) Cassio
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Cassio
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20090616
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1412^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) mayze
Holdings
Status de empréstimo Status de perda Status de danificação Restrição de uso Não pode ser emprestado Código da coleção Localização permanente Localização atual Data de aquisição Date last seen Preço efetivo a partir de Tipo de material
          Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos 2017-09-27 2017-09-27 2017-09-27 Periódico

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha