<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › MARC details for record no. 7266

Does government funding alter nonprofit governance? Evidence from New York City nonprofit contractors (Record no. 7266)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01924naa a2200193uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 7110
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20190211154217.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 020920s2005 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
999 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBERS (KOHA)
Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] PHL2MARC21 1.1
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name O'REGAN, Katherine
9 (RLIN) 7979
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Does government funding alter nonprofit governance? Evidence from New York City nonprofit contractors
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2002
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Government contracting has raised a collection of issues with respect to adequate oversight and accountability. This paper explores one avenue trough the governance practices of the contractor's board. Oversight and monitoring are a board's key responsibilities, and influencing a board's practices in one way a governmental agency key responsibilities, and influencing a board's practices is one way a governmental agency can help to insure quality performance. Agencies could thus use both their selection process and their post-contracting power to influence board practice. Using a new, rich data set on the nonprofit contractors of New York City, a series of hypotheses were tested on the relationship between government funding and board practices. Significant differences were found to exist in board practices as a function of government funding levels, differences that mark a shift of energy away from some activities (i.e., traditional board functions, such as fund-raising) towards others (financial monitoring and advocacy). This suggest that government agencies may indeed use their contracting choices with an eye to particular governance practices. This increased emphasis on such activities appears to crowd out other activities, and is not unambiguously to benefit on nonprofit board governance
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name OSTER, Sharon
9 (RLIN) 16644
773 08 - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
Related parts 21, 3, p. 359-379
Place, publisher, and date of publication , 2002
Record control number
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Periódico
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20020920
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) Lucima
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Lucimara
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN)
-- 20060511
Operator's initials, OID (RLIN) 1428^b
Cataloger's initials, CIN (RLIN) Quiteria
Holdings
Status de empréstimo Status de perda Status de danificação Restrição de uso Não pode ser emprestado Código da coleção Localização permanente Localização atual Data de aquisição Date last seen Preço efetivo a partir de Tipo de material
          Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos 2017-09-27 2017-09-27 2017-09-27 Periódico

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha