Ode to luther gulink : span of control and organizational performance
By: Meier, Kenneth J
.
Contributor(s): Bohte, John.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: Thousand Oaks : SAGE, May 2000Administration & Society 32, 2, p. 115-137Abstract: Early management scholars such as Henri Fayol, Lydat Urwick, and Luther Gulick argued that principles such as specialization of labor and hierarchical leadership structures would result in optimal organizational performance. This perspective was attacked by Hebert Simon, who argued that the principles of administrative management were vague and contradictory. Simon's devastating critique was widely accepted, and sholars soon turned their attention away from studying the principles of managemnt. Ironically, little systematic research existed on many of the principles of management. Ironically, little systematic research existed on many of the principles of management at the time Simon leveled his critique. In this study, the goal is to refocus attention on a particular principle of management, span of control, most closely associated with Luther Gulick. After discussing the importance of span of control to their understanding of organizational performance. They test their theory by examining how span of control to organizational performance. They test their theory by examining how span of control relationships among personnel in public shools influence student performance, using data on 678 Texas school districts over a 4 year period. The findings reveal that span of control relationships among organizational personnel significantly shape student performance
| Item type | Current location | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Periódico | Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos | Periódico | Not for loan |
Early management scholars such as Henri Fayol, Lydat Urwick, and Luther Gulick argued that principles such as specialization of labor and hierarchical leadership structures would result in optimal organizational performance. This perspective was attacked by Hebert Simon, who argued that the principles of administrative management were vague and contradictory. Simon's devastating critique was widely accepted, and sholars soon turned their attention away from studying the principles of managemnt. Ironically, little systematic research existed on many of the principles of management. Ironically, little systematic research existed on many of the principles of management at the time Simon leveled his critique. In this study, the goal is to refocus attention on a particular principle of management, span of control, most closely associated with Luther Gulick. After discussing the importance of span of control to their understanding of organizational performance. They test their theory by examining how span of control to organizational performance. They test their theory by examining how span of control relationships among personnel in public shools influence student performance, using data on 678 Texas school districts over a 4 year period. The findings reveal that span of control relationships among organizational personnel significantly shape student performance
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.