<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Coordination, moderation, and institutional balancing in American presidential and house elections
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Coordination, moderation, and institutional balancing in American presidential and house elections

By: MEBANE, Walter R., Jr.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: 2000American Political Science Review 94, 1, p. 37-58Abstract: Voters have been coordinating their choices for president and House of Representatives in recent presidential election year, with each voter using a strategy that features policy moderation. Coordination is defined as a noncooperative rational expectations equilibrium among voters, in which each voter has both common knowledge and private information about the election outcome. Stochastic choice models estimated using individual-level NES data from 1976-96 support coordination versus a model in which voters act nonstrategicaly to moderate policy. The empirical coordinating model satisfies the fixe-point condition that defines the common knowledge expectation voters have about the ourcome in the theoretical equilibrium. The proportion of voters who split their ticket in order to balance the House with the president has been small but large enough to affect election outcomes. Moderatin has usually been based on voters` expectations whta the president wil be at least an equal of the House of determining postelection policy
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
Periódico Not for loan

Voters have been coordinating their choices for president and House of Representatives in recent presidential election year, with each voter using a strategy that features policy moderation. Coordination is defined as a noncooperative rational expectations equilibrium among voters, in which each voter has both common knowledge and private information about the election outcome. Stochastic choice models estimated using individual-level NES data from 1976-96 support coordination versus a model in which voters act nonstrategicaly to moderate policy. The empirical coordinating model satisfies the fixe-point condition that defines the common knowledge expectation voters have about the ourcome in the theoretical equilibrium. The proportion of voters who split their ticket in order to balance the House with the president has been small but large enough to affect election outcomes. Moderatin has usually been based on voters` expectations whta the president wil be at least an equal of the House of determining postelection policy

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha