<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: The public administration doctoral dissertation reexamined :
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The public administration doctoral dissertation reexamined : an evaluation of the dissertation of 1998

By: Cleary, Robert E.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: Malden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, sep./oct.2000Public Administration Review: PAR 60, 5, p. 446-455Abstract: What makes a good doctoral dissertation in public administration ? Analysis of abstracts of 168 public administration doctoral dissertation included in Dissertation Abstracts 1998, on the basis of criteria first developed to analyze the PA dissertations of 1981, indicates material progress in the use of the doctoral dissertation as a research tool to educate students ad to advance the field of public administration. The 1998 dissertations showed substantial improvements in quality over those in Dissertation Abstracts 1990, almost as much improvement as those studies showed over the project of 1981. Compared to 1990, a substantially higher percentage of the 1998 dissertation set out to conduct basic research and to report on the findings. In addition, more doctoral students are using rigorous research designs that involve attention to causal relationships
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
Periódico Not for loan

What makes a good doctoral dissertation in public administration ? Analysis of abstracts of 168 public administration doctoral dissertation included in Dissertation Abstracts 1998, on the basis of criteria first developed to analyze the PA dissertations of 1981, indicates material progress in the use of the doctoral dissertation as a research tool to educate students ad to advance the field of public administration. The 1998 dissertations showed substantial improvements in quality over those in Dissertation Abstracts 1990, almost as much improvement as those studies showed over the project of 1981. Compared to 1990, a substantially higher percentage of the 1998 dissertation set out to conduct basic research and to report on the findings. In addition, more doctoral students are using rigorous research designs that involve attention to causal relationships

Public Administration Review PAR

September/October 2000 Volume 60 Number 5

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha