Research on policy implementation : assessment and prospect
By: O'TOLLE JR, Laurence J
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: apr. 2000Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10, 2, p. 263-288Abstract: While policy implementation no longer frames the core question of public policy, some scholars have debated appropriate steps for revitalization. And the practical world stands just as much in need now of valid knowledge about policy implementation as ever. Where has all the policy implementation gone? Or at least all the scholarly signs of it? And why? What has the field accomplished? Should a ressurgence of attention to the subject be exhorted? And if so, in what directions? This article considers these questions a foci on an assessment of the state of the field, and the argument reaches somewhat unconventional conclusions: there is more here than meets the eye. While modest to moderate progress can be noted on a number of fronts, an initial assessment is likely to understate the extent of work underway on matters quite close to the implementation theme. Research on policy implementation-like questions has partially transmogrified. One has to look, sometimes, in unusual places and be informed by a broder logic of intellectual development to make sense of the relevant scholarship. Policy implementation work, in short, continues to bear relevance for important themes of policy and management. But some of the course has shifted, the questions habe broadened, and the agenda has become complicated. Research on implementation, under whatever currently fashionable labels is alive and lively
| Item type | Current location | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Periódico | Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos | Periódico | Not for loan |
While policy implementation no longer frames the core question of public policy, some scholars have debated appropriate steps for revitalization. And the practical world stands just as much in need now of valid knowledge about policy implementation as ever. Where has all the policy implementation gone? Or at least all the scholarly signs of it? And why? What has the field accomplished? Should a ressurgence of attention to the subject be exhorted? And if so, in what directions? This article considers these questions a foci on an assessment of the state of the field, and the argument reaches somewhat unconventional conclusions: there is more here than meets the eye. While modest to moderate progress can be noted on a number of fronts, an initial assessment is likely to understate the extent of work underway on matters quite close to the implementation theme. Research on policy implementation-like questions has partially transmogrified. One has to look, sometimes, in unusual places and be informed by a broder logic of intellectual development to make sense of the relevant scholarship. Policy implementation work, in short, continues to bear relevance for important themes of policy and management. But some of the course has shifted, the questions habe broadened, and the agenda has become complicated. Research on implementation, under whatever currently fashionable labels is alive and lively
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.