<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Non-state actors and false dichotomies :
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Non-state actors and false dichotomies : reviewing IR/IPE approaches to european integration

By: COWLES, Maria Green.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: Jeremy Richardson, February 2003Subject(s): Globalização | Terceiro Setor | Área de Livre Comércio | EuropaJournal of European Public Policy 10, 1, p. 102-120Abstract: Many IR and IPE theories marginalize non-state actors in a manner inconsistent with their role in EU integration, governance, and policy-making. Yet multinational firms, NGOs, and advocacy networks are increasingly important players in today`s global economy. This review article examines four theories/ approaches that tend to ignore this development: neorealism, isntitutionalism, constructivism, and the critical school. To shed light on the literature`s marginalization of non-state actors, I identify three false dichotomies: (1)the international versus domestic, (2) the public versus private, and (3) the good versus bad. The article provides empirical evidence to demonstrate why these dichotomies must be transcended and discusses theoretical developments that better account for non-state actors. Finally, I recognize a fourth false dichotomy between the american IR/IPE theories and the european comparative, political economy, and governance approaches. Rather than adopting one approach over another, this paper suggests that both schools of thought can benefit from on another
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Periódico Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
Periódico Not for loan

Many IR and IPE theories marginalize non-state actors in a manner inconsistent with their role in EU integration, governance, and policy-making. Yet multinational firms, NGOs, and advocacy networks are increasingly important players in today`s global economy. This review article examines four theories/ approaches that tend to ignore this development: neorealism, isntitutionalism, constructivism, and the critical school. To shed light on the literature`s marginalization of non-state actors, I identify three false dichotomies: (1)the international versus domestic, (2) the public versus private, and (3) the good versus bad. The article provides empirical evidence to demonstrate why these dichotomies must be transcended and discusses theoretical developments that better account for non-state actors. Finally, I recognize a fourth false dichotomy between the american IR/IPE theories and the european comparative, political economy, and governance approaches. Rather than adopting one approach over another, this paper suggests that both schools of thought can benefit from on another

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha