Comparing policy process frameworks : what do they tell us about group membership and participation for policy development?
By: SOBECK, Joanne
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: Thousand Oaks : SAGE, July 2003Administration & Society 35, 3, p. 350-374Abstract: Theoretical models impose a framework for viewing the policy process. Some emphasize institutional rules. Others focus on beliefs and values. This research, using a case study of substance abuse policy development within a local community context, examines three frameworks: the advocacy coalition framework (ACF), bureaucratic politics framework, and institutional analysis and development framework (IADF). The frameworks examine an early stage of policy development emphasizing group membership and participation. The results show that membership and participation were best explained using the AFC and the IADF. Strnghts and challenges in using each framework are discussed, as well as implications for local policy making
Theoretical models impose a framework for viewing the policy process. Some emphasize institutional rules. Others focus on beliefs and values. This research, using a case study of substance abuse policy development within a local community context, examines three frameworks: the advocacy coalition framework (ACF), bureaucratic politics framework, and institutional analysis and development framework (IADF). The frameworks examine an early stage of policy development emphasizing group membership and participation. The results show that membership and participation were best explained using the AFC and the IADF. Strnghts and challenges in using each framework are discussed, as well as implications for local policy making
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.