Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order : explaining political change
By: LIEBERMAN, Robert C
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: New York : Cambridge University Press, December 2002American Political Science Review 96, 4, p. 697-712Abstract: Institutional approaches to explaning plitical phenomena suffer from three common limitations: reductionism, reliance on exogenous factors, and excessive emphasis on order and structure. Ideational approaches to political explanation, while oftem more sensitive to change and agency, largely exhibit the same shortcomings. In particular, both perspectives share an emphasis on discerning and explaining patterns of ordered regularity in politics, making it hard to explain important episodes of political change. Relaxing this emphasis on order and viewing politics as situated in multiple and not necessarily equilibrated order suggests a way of synthesizing institutional and ideational approaches and developing more convincing accounts of political change. In this view, change arises out of 'friction" among mismatched institutional and ideational patterns. An account of America civil right policy in the 1960s and 1970s, wich is not amenable to either straightfoward institutional or ideational explanation, demonstrates the advantages of the approach.
Institutional approaches to explaning plitical phenomena suffer from three common limitations: reductionism, reliance on exogenous factors, and excessive emphasis on order and structure. Ideational approaches to political explanation, while oftem more sensitive to change and agency, largely exhibit the same shortcomings. In particular, both perspectives share an emphasis on discerning and explaining patterns of ordered regularity in politics, making it hard to explain important episodes of political change. Relaxing this emphasis on order and viewing politics as situated in multiple and not necessarily equilibrated order suggests a way of synthesizing institutional and ideational approaches and developing more convincing accounts of political change. In this view, change arises out of 'friction" among mismatched institutional and ideational patterns. An account of America civil right policy in the 1960s and 1970s, wich is not amenable to either straightfoward institutional or ideational explanation, demonstrates the advantages of the approach.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.