Madison v. Hamilton : the battle over republicanism and the role of public opinion
By: SHEEHAN, Colleen A
.
Material type: ![materialTypeLabel](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/AR.png)
This article examines the causes of the dispute between James Madison and Alexander Hamilton in the early 1790s. Though Hamilton initially believed that Madison´s opposition to the Federalist administration was probably motivated by personal animosity and political advantage, in later years he concluded what Madison had long argued: the controversy between Republicanism and Federalists stemmed form a difference of principle. For Madison, republicanism meant the recognition of the sovereignty of public opinion and the commitment to participatory politics. Hamilton advocated a more submissive role for the citizenry and a more independent status for the political elite. While Madison did not deny to policital leaders and enlightened men a critical place in the formation of public opinion, he fought against Hamilton´s thin version of public opinion as "confidence" in government. In 1791-92 Madison took the Republican lead in providing a philosophic defense for a tangible, active, and reponsible role for the citizens of republican government.
There are no comments for this item.