Community development in dhicago : from Harold Washington to Richard M. Daley
By: BETANCUR, John J
.
Contributor(s): GILLS, Douglas C.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: Thousand Oaks : SAGE, July 2004The Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science 594, p. 92-108Abstract: This article examines the trasnformation of community development in Chicago in the last three decades from a predomintely grassroots movement for social change to a much smaller and fragmented one led by professionalized groups. It focuses on Harold Washington's and Richard M. Daley's mayoral regimes and the ways they helped to shape the context and implementation of community development. The major theme in the article is that this movement lost most of its capacity to be innovate and to contribute to progressivism (most evident under the Washington administration) when it lost its basic connections to grassroots leadership under the subsequent Daley administration. As a consequence, problems like proverty, homelessness, poor schooling, and greater racial and class divisions have resulted. The discussion and analysis is based on interviews of people involved with both regimes and a review of changes in policies and practices between the Washington and current Daley (Daley II) period. The article concludes with a sober overview of how community development has been absconded to serve the interests of progrowth and corporate interests rather than used as a tool to promote fairness, access, and equity in low-income neighborhoods
This article examines the trasnformation of community development in Chicago in the last three decades from a predomintely grassroots movement for social change to a much smaller and fragmented one led by professionalized groups. It focuses on Harold Washington's and Richard M. Daley's mayoral regimes and the ways they helped to shape the context and implementation of community development. The major theme in the article is that this movement lost most of its capacity to be innovate and to contribute to progressivism (most evident under the Washington administration) when it lost its basic connections to grassroots leadership under the subsequent Daley administration. As a consequence, problems like proverty, homelessness, poor schooling, and greater racial and class divisions have resulted. The discussion and analysis is based on interviews of people involved with both regimes and a review of changes in policies and practices between the Washington and current Daley (Daley II) period. The article concludes with a sober overview of how community development has been absconded to serve the interests of progrowth and corporate interests rather than used as a tool to promote fairness, access, and equity in low-income neighborhoods
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.