<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Media Effects and Russian Elections, 1999-2000
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Media Effects and Russian Elections, 1999-2000

By: WHITE, Stephen; OATES, Sarah; McALLISTER, Ian.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, April 2005British Journal of Political Science 35, 2, p. 191-208Abstract: The Russian parliamentary and presidential elections of December 1999 and March 2000 appeared to have been won in large part through the partisam use of (particularly state) television. According to the evidence of a spring 2001 national survey, television was the main source of political information for the supporters of all parties and candidates. However, state television (which had been most supportive f the Kremlin) was much more likely to be favoured by the supporters of the pro-regime Unity party: while commercial television (which had provide a more even-handed coverage of the elections) was more popular and respected among the supporters of anti-Kremlin parties and candidates and less popular among supporters of Vladimir Putin. Regression analysis that takes account of reciprocal causation between media source and vote choice indicates that these were not spurious associations. The findings suggest that the state itself may exercise a disproportionate influence upon the electoral process in newly established systems in wich social structures and political allegiances remain fluid
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

The Russian parliamentary and presidential elections of December 1999 and March 2000 appeared to have been won in large part through the partisam use of (particularly state) television. According to the evidence of a spring 2001 national survey, television was the main source of political information for the supporters of all parties and candidates. However, state television (which had been most supportive f the Kremlin) was much more likely to be favoured by the supporters of the pro-regime Unity party: while commercial television (which had provide a more even-handed coverage of the elections) was more popular and respected among the supporters of anti-Kremlin parties and candidates and less popular among supporters of Vladimir Putin. Regression analysis that takes account of reciprocal causation between media source and vote choice indicates that these were not spurious associations. The findings suggest that the state itself may exercise a disproportionate influence upon the electoral process in newly established systems in wich social structures and political allegiances remain fluid

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha