The Supreme Court and the US Presidential Election of 2000 : wounds, self-inflicted or otherwise
By: GIBSON, James L.; CALDEIRA, Gregory A.; SPENCE, Lester Kenyatta
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, October 2003British Journal of Political Science 33, 4, p. 535-556Abstract: The conventional wisdom about the Us Supreme Court and the 2000 presidential election is that the Court wounded itself by participating in such a partisan dispute. By 'wounded' people mean that the institution lost some of this legitimancy. Evidence from our survey, conducted in early 2001, suggests little if any diminution of the Court's legitimancy in the aftermath of Bush v. Gore, even among African Americans. We observe a relationship between evaluations of the opinion and institutional legitimancy, but the bulk of the causality seems to flow from loyalty to evaluations of the case , not vice versa. We argue that legitimancy frames perceptions of the Court opinion. Futhermore, increased awareness of the activities of the Court tends to reinforce legitimancy by exposing people to the powerful symblos of law. In 2000, legitimancy did indeed seem to provide a reservoir of good will that allowed the Court to weather the storm created by is involvement in Florida's presidential election
The conventional wisdom about the Us Supreme Court and the 2000 presidential election is that the Court wounded itself by participating in such a partisan dispute. By 'wounded' people mean that the institution lost some of this legitimancy. Evidence from our survey, conducted in early 2001, suggests little if any diminution of the Court's legitimancy in the aftermath of Bush v. Gore, even among African Americans. We observe a relationship between evaluations of the opinion and institutional legitimancy, but the bulk of the causality seems to flow from loyalty to evaluations of the case , not vice versa. We argue that legitimancy frames perceptions of the Court opinion. Futhermore, increased awareness of the activities of the Court tends to reinforce legitimancy by exposing people to the powerful symblos of law. In 2000, legitimancy did indeed seem to provide a reservoir of good will that allowed the Court to weather the storm created by is involvement in Florida's presidential election
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.