The Inverse Relationship Between Party Strength and Executive Strength : a theory of politicians' constitutional choices
By: SHUGART, Matthew Soberg.
Material type: ArticlePublisher: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, January 1998British Journal of Political Science 28, 1, p. 1-29Abstract: Constitutions devised by rank-and-file legislative politicians in the 'Third Wave' of democratization tend to exhibit an inverse relationship between party strength and executive strength. Party crength refers to the extend to which legislators campaing on the basis of their parties' reputations as providers of public policy as opposed to personal reputations as providers of more narrowly targeted services. Executive strength refers to the constitutional authority of the executive to influence policy independent of partisan support in the legislature. Politicians' interest in one configuration of power or another can be deduced logically from the situation in which they find themselves at the time they are designing a new democratic regimeConstitutions devised by rank-and-file legislative politicians in the 'Third Wave' of democratization tend to exhibit an inverse relationship between party strength and executive strength. Party crength refers to the extend to which legislators campaing on the basis of their parties' reputations as providers of public policy as opposed to personal reputations as providers of more narrowly targeted services. Executive strength refers to the constitutional authority of the executive to influence policy independent of partisan support in the legislature. Politicians' interest in one configuration of power or another can be deduced logically from the situation in which they find themselves at the time they are designing a new democratic regime
There are no comments for this item.