Programme management : a critical review
By: Mark Lycett.
Contributor(s): Andreas Rassau | John Danson.
Material type: ArticlePublisher: Nijkerk : Elsevier, 2004International Journal of Project Management 22, 4, p. 289-299Abstract: There is an increasing recognition that programme management provides a means to bridge the gap between project delivery and organisational strategy. Significant tensions tend to arise across this gap, however, between the inward-focused and task-oriented view of projects and strategy-focused and often emergent wider organisational view. It is argued within this paper that standard programme management approaches actually exacerbate these tensions. Through a critical review of standard programme management approaches, a number of issues are highlighted that concern (a) an excessive control focus, (b) insufficient flexibility in the context of an evolving business strategy, (c) ineffective co-operation between projects within the programme. These issues are traced back to the two flawed assumptions underlying programme management; namely that (a) programme management is in effect a scaled-up version of project management and (b) a one size fits all approach to programme management is appropriate. In combination these observations are used to provide grounding for a fundamentally different approach to programme management designed for flexibility, enabled for adaptability in a changing business environment and focused throughout on the effective management of key stakeholder relationshipsThere is an increasing recognition that programme management provides a means to bridge the gap between project delivery and organisational strategy. Significant tensions tend to arise across this gap, however, between the inward-focused and task-oriented view of projects and strategy-focused and often emergent wider organisational view. It is argued within this paper that standard programme management approaches actually exacerbate these tensions. Through a critical review of standard programme management approaches, a number of issues are highlighted that concern (a) an excessive control focus, (b) insufficient flexibility in the context of an evolving business strategy, (c) ineffective co-operation between projects within the programme. These issues are traced back to the two flawed assumptions underlying programme management; namely that (a) programme management is in effect a scaled-up version of project management and (b) a one size fits all approach to programme management is appropriate. In combination these observations are used to provide grounding for a fundamentally different approach to programme management designed for flexibility, enabled for adaptability in a changing business environment and focused throughout on the effective management of key stakeholder relationships
There are no comments for this item.