Policy analysis, policy practice and political science
By: COLEBATCH, H.K
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: Oxford : Blackwell Publishers Limited, September 2005Australian Journal Of Public Administration 64, 3, p. 14-23Abstract: Bridgman and Davis have responded to criticism of their widely-used model of the policy process as a cycle, 'a series of interlocking steps' by describing it as 'pragmatic', a 'toolkit', 'not a theory'. This article asks what makes for 'practical knowledge' of the policy process. It identifies the theoretical basis for the 'policy cycle' model, and asks how this model relates to research on policy and to policy practitioners' own knowledge. It argues that we need to recognise the way that underlying theory about policy forms part of policy practice, and to give more attention to the relationship between research, experiential knowledge, and formal maps like the 'policy cycle'
Bridgman and Davis have responded to criticism of their widely-used model of the policy process as a cycle, 'a series of interlocking steps' by describing it as 'pragmatic', a 'toolkit', 'not a theory'. This article asks what makes for 'practical knowledge' of the policy process. It identifies the theoretical basis for the 'policy cycle' model, and asks how this model relates to research on policy and to policy practitioners' own knowledge. It argues that we need to recognise the way that underlying theory about policy forms part of policy practice, and to give more attention to the relationship between research, experiential knowledge, and formal maps like the 'policy cycle'
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.