A rationalist-institutionalist explanation of endogenous regional integration
By: FARRELL, Henry
.
Contributor(s): HÉRITIER, Adrienne.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: Philadelphia, PA : Routledge, April 2005Subject(s): Bargaining theory | Endogenous institutional change and regional integration | Epistemic communities | Formal and informal institutionsJournal of European Public Policy 12, 2, p. 273 - 290 Abstract: What is at the basis of regional integration and what are the processes that drive integration? Why do integration processes develop faster in some issue areas than in others? These questions are at the heart of our own work, just as they are the driving concerns of Ernst Haas's version of neofunctionalism. While we, unlike Haas, emphasize endogenous processes of institutional change based on bargaining processes in a particular institutional context, rather than exogenously driven processes of technical needs and spillover, we believe that there is important overlap between our approach and Haas's, as well as areas of disagreement. By exploring these areas of overlap in this article, we hope by focusing on bargaining processes to empirically illustrate on the one hand how our approach may help to answer questions that Haas's version of neofunctionalism had difficulties with, and on the other how Haas's emphasis on epistemic factors can alleviate some of the blind spots in our own perspective.
What is at the basis of regional integration and what are the processes that drive integration? Why do integration processes develop faster in some issue areas than in others? These questions are at the heart of our own work, just as they are the driving concerns of Ernst Haas's version of neofunctionalism. While we, unlike Haas, emphasize endogenous processes of institutional change based on bargaining processes in a particular institutional context, rather than exogenously driven processes of technical needs and spillover, we believe that there is important overlap between our approach and Haas's, as well as areas of disagreement. By exploring these areas of overlap in this article, we hope by focusing on bargaining processes to empirically illustrate on the one hand how our approach may help to answer questions that Haas's version of neofunctionalism had difficulties with, and on the other how Haas's emphasis on epistemic factors can alleviate some of the blind spots in our own perspective.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.