<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Response to McGahan and Porter's commentary on Industry, corporate and business-segment effects and business performance :
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Response to McGahan and Porter's commentary on Industry, corporate and business-segment effects and business performance : a non-parametric approach

By: RUEFLI, Timothy W.
Contributor(s): WIGGINS, Robert R.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: UK : Wiley, September 2005Subject(s): Non-parametric analysis | Variance components analysis | Ceteris paribus assumptionStrategic Management Journal 26, 9, p. 881 - 886Abstract: In the comment on Ruefli and Wiggins (2003), a number of points are made supporting the variance component analysis approach to determining the importance of industry, corporate, and business segment factors on business segment performance. This response addresses in more detail the nature of the methodological and statistical assumptions made by variance components analysis or ANOVA and their implications for the puzzling results obtained when these techniques are employed. The response then contrasts the variance-based methodologies with a non-parametric approach used in Ruefli and Wiggins (2003) that makes fewer and weaker assumptions and yields more robust and more internally consistent results. The response also examines the limitations of employing an autoregressive approach to measuring persistence of abnormal profits and contrasts it with a non-parametric methodology presented in the article.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

In the comment on Ruefli and Wiggins (2003), a number of points are made supporting the variance component analysis approach to determining the importance of industry, corporate, and business segment factors on business segment performance. This response addresses in more detail the nature of the methodological and statistical assumptions made by variance components analysis or ANOVA and their implications for the puzzling results obtained when these techniques are employed. The response then contrasts the variance-based methodologies with a non-parametric approach used in Ruefli and Wiggins (2003) that makes fewer and weaker assumptions and yields more robust and more internally consistent results. The response also examines the limitations of employing an autoregressive approach to measuring persistence of abnormal profits and contrasts it with a non-parametric methodology presented in the article.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha