MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates
By: CANTWELL, John
.
Contributor(s): MUDAMBI, Ram
.
Material type: ![materialTypeLabel](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/AR.png)
![](/opac-tmpl/bootstrap/images/filefind.png)
![](/opac-tmpl/bootstrap/images/filefind.png)
![](/opac-tmpl/bootstrap/images/filefind.png)
![](/opac-tmpl/bootstrap/images/filefind.png)
![](/opac-tmpl/bootstrap/images/filefind.png)
![](/opac-tmpl/bootstrap/images/filefind.png)
The determinants of R&D intensity differ between subsidiaries in a multinational enterprise (MNE). Previous literature suggests that whether a subsidiary achieves a competence-creating output mandate depends on the qualities of its location. R&D strategies in competence-creating subsidiaries are supply-driven while those in purely competence-exploiting subsidiaries are demand-driven. Using data on U.K. subsidiaries of non-U.K. MNEs, we find that the level of subsidiary R&D depends on MNE group-level and subsidiary-level characteristics as well as locational factors. The R&D of mandated subsidiaries rises with acquisition, but for non-mandated subsidiaries R&D falls upon acquisition. MNEs that grow through acquisition have more inter-subsidiary R&D diversity.
There are no comments for this item.