<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Regulating genetically modified crops and foods in Canada and the United Kingdom
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Regulating genetically modified crops and foods in Canada and the United Kingdom

By: HARTLEY, Sarah.
Contributor(s): SKOGSTAD, Grace.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: Toronto : IPAC, Fall 2005Canadian Publique Administration Publique du Canada 48, 3, p. 305-327Abstract: This article examines the alternate use of models of representative, functional, and citizen-centred participatory democracy in the formulation of policies to regulate the risks of genetically modified crops and foods in the United Kingdom and Canada. It demonstrates that representative, functional and participatory democracy have all played a role in the United Kingdom; functional democracy has been ascendant in Canada, with representative democracy playing a secondary role. These cross-national differences derive from the greater imperative for regulatory legitimacy in the UK, and the Canadian preoccupation with regulatory effectiveness. The result is a more transparent UK regulatory framework that provides representation of a broader range of public values and concerns than in Canada.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

This article examines the alternate use of models of representative, functional, and citizen-centred participatory democracy in the formulation of policies to regulate the risks of genetically modified crops and foods in the United Kingdom and Canada. It demonstrates that representative, functional and participatory democracy have all played a role in the United Kingdom; functional democracy has been ascendant in Canada, with representative democracy playing a secondary role. These cross-national differences derive from the greater imperative for regulatory legitimacy in the UK, and the Canadian preoccupation with regulatory effectiveness. The result is a more transparent UK regulatory framework that provides representation of a broader range of public values and concerns than in Canada.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha