Overcoming apartheid : can truth reconcile a divided nation?
By: GIBSON, James L
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: Thousand Oaks : SAGE, January 2006The Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science 603, p. 82-110Abstract: Throughout the world, truth commissions are being constructed under the hope that discovering the "truth" about a country's conflictual past will somehow contribute to "reconciliation." Most such efforts point to South Africa's process as an exemplar of the powerful influence of truth finding. But has truth actually contributed to reconciliation in South Africa? No rigorous and systematic assessment of the truth and reconciliation process has ever been conducted. This article investigates the hypothesis that truth leads to reconciliation. Based on a survey of thirty-seven hundred South Africans in 2001, the author begins by giving both "truth" and "reconciliation" clear conceptual and operational meaning. The author reports empirical evidence that the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's "truth" is fairly widely accepted by South Africans of all races, that some degree of reconciliation characterizes South Africa today, and that the collective memory produced by the process ("truth") did indeed contribute to reconciliation. The author then considers whether other divided countries might be able to use a similar process to propel themselves toward a more peaceful and democratic future.
Throughout the world, truth commissions are being constructed under the hope that discovering the "truth" about a country's conflictual past will somehow contribute to "reconciliation." Most such efforts point to South Africa's process as an exemplar of the powerful influence of truth finding. But has truth actually contributed to reconciliation in South Africa? No rigorous and systematic assessment of the truth and reconciliation process has ever been conducted. This article investigates the hypothesis that truth leads to reconciliation. Based on a survey of thirty-seven hundred South Africans in 2001, the author begins by giving both "truth" and "reconciliation" clear conceptual and operational meaning. The author reports empirical evidence that the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's "truth" is fairly widely accepted by South Africans of all races, that some degree of reconciliation characterizes South Africa today, and that the collective memory produced by the process ("truth") did indeed contribute to reconciliation. The author then considers whether other divided countries might be able to use a similar process to propel themselves toward a more peaceful and democratic future.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.