<style type="text/css"> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style> Enap catalog › Details for: Agenda setting, the "third wave," and the administrative state
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Agenda setting, the "third wave," and the administrative state

By: DURANT, Robert F.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: Thousand Oaks : SAGE, July 1998Administration & Society 30, 3, p. 211-247Abstract: On the eve of a new millennium, the United States appears bent on diffusing the administrative state’s (Waldo) authority to address social problems throughout the public, market, and civic spheres. Ascendant presently in informing this "neoadministrative" state is a "downsizing, defunding, and devolution" (D3) agenda premised on behavioral, instrumental, and normative assumptions that are not so much wrong as seriously incomplete. This article argues that appropriately matching the metes and bounds of the neoadministrative state with the challenges posed by Third Wave transformations will elude the United States unless an alternative agenda is offered. This agenda must go beyond one-size-fits-all prescriptions, be better informed by empirically based research, and be culturally resonant with the values Lipset identifies as the "American Creed." To this end, the rudiments of—and important questions posed by—a "reconnecting, reconceptualizing, and reengaging" (R3) agenda are offered, which may yet reframe debates over the neoadministrative state in the 21st century
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

On the eve of a new millennium, the United States appears bent on diffusing the administrative state’s (Waldo) authority to address social problems throughout the public, market, and civic spheres. Ascendant presently in informing this "neoadministrative" state is a "downsizing, defunding, and devolution" (D3) agenda premised on behavioral, instrumental, and normative assumptions that are not so much wrong as seriously incomplete. This article argues that appropriately matching the metes and bounds of the neoadministrative state with the challenges posed by Third Wave transformations will elude the United States unless an alternative agenda is offered. This agenda must go beyond one-size-fits-all prescriptions, be better informed by empirically based research, and be culturally resonant with the values Lipset identifies as the "American Creed." To this end, the rudiments of—and important questions posed by—a "reconnecting, reconceptualizing, and reengaging" (R3) agenda are offered, which may yet reframe debates over the neoadministrative state in the 21st century

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Endereço:

  • Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos
  • Funcionamento: segunda a sexta-feira, das 9h às 19h
  • +55 61 2020-3139 / biblioteca@enap.gov.br
  • SPO Área Especial 2-A
  • CEP 70610-900 - Brasília/DF
<
Acesso à Informação TRANSPARÊNCIA

Powered by Koha