Why the brownlow commijtee failed : neutrality and partisanship in the early years of public administration
By: ROBERTS, Alasdair
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: Thousand Oaks : SAGE, May 1996Administration & Society 28, 1, p. 3-38Abstract: In 1938, Congress rejected a package of administrative reforms that had been developed by a commiuttee of academics headed by Louis B mwnlow. The defeat was the worst that President Roosevelt would suffer in three terms as President. This article suggests that the Brownlow Committee contributed to the debacle in Congress by ignoring evidence that its recommendations would prove contentious. It is argued that the committee members were caught in a dilemma: On the one hand, they wanted to obtain immediate reformsforapresident to whom they felt a personal loyalty; on the other, they needed to maintain a demonstration of neutrality, which made it difficult to undertake the tasks of political management that were essential to craft a viable reform program. The demonstration of neutrality was a combination of arguments and routines that the academic community had invented to allay public skepticism about its members'trustworthiness as advisers on contentious issues
In 1938, Congress rejected a package of administrative reforms that had been developed by a commiuttee of academics headed by Louis B mwnlow. The defeat was the worst that President Roosevelt would suffer in three terms as President. This article suggests that the Brownlow Committee contributed to the debacle in Congress by ignoring evidence that its recommendations would prove contentious. It is argued that the committee members were caught in a dilemma: On the one hand, they wanted to obtain immediate reformsforapresident to whom they felt a personal loyalty; on the other, they needed to maintain a demonstration of neutrality, which made it difficult to undertake the tasks of political management that were essential to craft a viable reform program. The demonstration of neutrality was a combination of arguments and routines that the academic community had invented to allay public skepticism about its members'trustworthiness as advisers on contentious issues
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.