The strategic timing of position taking in Congress : a study of the North American Free Trade Agreement
By: BOX-STEFFENSMEIER, Janet M
.
Contributor(s): ARNOLD, Laura W | ZORN, Christopher J.W.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, June 1997American Political Science Review 91, 2, p. 324-338Abstract: A critical element of decision making is the timing of choices political actors make; often when a decision is made is as critical as the decision itself We posit a dynamic model of strategic position announcement based on signaling theories of legislative politics. We suggest that members who receive clear signals from constituents, interest groups, and policy leaders will announce their positions earlier. Those with conflicting signals will seek more information, delaying their announcement. We test several expectations by examining data on when members of the House of Representatives announced their positions on the North American Free Trade Agreement. We also contrast the timing model with a vote model, and find that there are meaningful differences between the factors influencing the timing of position announcements and vote choice. Our research allows analysts to interpret the process leading up to the House action and the end state of that process.
A critical element of decision making is the timing of choices political actors make; often when a decision is made is as critical as the decision itself We posit a dynamic model of strategic position announcement based on signaling theories of legislative politics. We suggest that members who receive clear signals from constituents, interest groups, and policy leaders will announce their positions earlier. Those with conflicting signals will seek more information, delaying their announcement. We test several expectations by examining data on when members of the House of Representatives announced their positions on the North American Free Trade Agreement. We also contrast the timing model with a vote model, and find that there are meaningful differences between the factors influencing the timing of position announcements and vote choice. Our research allows analysts to interpret the process leading up to the House action and the end state of that process.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.