Towards better qualitative performance measurement in organizations
By: SUN, Peter Yih-Tong.
Contributor(s): SCOTT, John L.
Material type: ArticlePublisher: West Yorkshire, England : MCB University Press, 2003Subject(s): Learning organizations | Performance measuresThe Learning Organization : an international journal 10, 4 and 5, p. 258-271Abstract: In a rapidly changing business environment, the need to constantly adapt is deemed essential to maintain competitive advantage. This requires an optimum balance of quantitative and qualitative measures to monitor progress and performance. This paper provides a framework of thought process that will guide practitioners in developing better qualitative measures and seeks to answer three essential questions: thought process 1 what is the nature of reality? Provides the answer to the question, can the phenomenon be realistically measured? Thought process 2 what are the processes used for constructing the measure? Provides answer to the question, are the processes appropriate and sufficiently influential? Thought process 3 what usefulness and power does this measure provide? Provides answer to the question, is it powerful in a practical environment? The framework was applied to measurement in learning organization contexts and ten models were reviewed. Conclusions cover deficiencies in the models and suggestions on how they might be improvedIn a rapidly changing business environment, the need to constantly adapt is deemed essential to maintain competitive advantage. This requires an optimum balance of quantitative and qualitative measures to monitor progress and performance. This paper provides a framework of thought process that will guide practitioners in developing better qualitative measures and seeks to answer three essential questions: thought process 1 what is the nature of reality? Provides the answer to the question, can the phenomenon be realistically measured? Thought process 2 what are the processes used for constructing the measure? Provides answer to the question, are the processes appropriate and sufficiently influential? Thought process 3 what usefulness and power does this measure provide? Provides answer to the question, is it powerful in a practical environment? The framework was applied to measurement in learning organization contexts and ten models were reviewed. Conclusions cover deficiencies in the models and suggestions on how they might be improved
There are no comments for this item.